翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Communauté de communes du canton de Combles
・ Communauté de communes du canton de Conty
・ Communauté de Communes du Canton de Criquetot-l'Esneval
・ Communauté de communes du Canton de Fauquembergues
・ Communauté de communes du Canton de Forges-les-Eaux
・ Communauté de communes du Canton de Fruges et environs
・ Communauté de communes du Canton de Gournay-en-Bray
・ Communal constituencies
・ Communal Council of Monaco
・ Communal Democracy Party
・ Communal Depot of the Foreign Regiments
・ Communal dining
・ Communal Farm, Isfahan
・ Communal forests of India
・ Communal garden
Communal House of the Textile Institute
・ Communal land
・ Communal Liberation Party
・ Communal meal
・ Communal oven
・ Communal ownership
・ Communal President
・ Communal reinforcement
・ Communal roosting
・ Communal Section (Haiti)
・ Communal shopping
・ Communal shower
・ Communal violence
・ Communal Wildlife Conservancies in Namibia
・ Communal work


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Communal House of the Textile Institute : ウィキペディア英語版
Communal House of the Textile Institute

Communal House of the Textile Institute (also known simply as ''Nikolaev's House'') is a constructivist architecture landmark located in the Donskoy District of Moscow, Russia. The building, designed by Ivan Nikolaev to accommodate 2000 students, was erected in 1929-1931 and functioned as a student dormitory until 1996.〔Sevryukova〕 As of August 2008, parts of the building are leased as office space, while the main residential block is abandoned and gutted inside; the current owner, Moscow Institute of Steel and Alloys, plans to rehabilitate the dilapidated structure into a modern campus.
==Design==

The Communal House of the Moscow Institute of Steel and Alloys became the first solo project for 28-year-old Ivan Nikolaev of the OSA Group; the contract awarded to him was a part of a larger project that included three student campuses in (then) remote areas of Moscow. The contract specification defined a modest maximum construction cost and building volume (50 cubic metres) per student.〔Khan-Magomedov, p.335〕 Any communal facilities, from staircases to libraries, counted towards the quota and decreased the actual living space. While all architects addressed these constraints by reducing available living space, Nikolaev's proposal was the most radical of all.
Nikolaev's principal design rule was a strict physical separation of common study space, public services (with cafeteria, showers and storage rooms) and the living space. Thus the building was H-shaped: a public services block connected a 200-metre long, 8-storey dormitory with a 3-story study block. Since all the students' possessions - from textbooks to day clothing - had to be stored in the lockers of the public services block, Nikolaev reduced dormitory rooms to sleeping space only. Initially, a standard sleeping cabin for two had a very small area, 2×2 metres, but 3.2 metres tall. It had no windows and was connected by the door to a long corridor running along the exterior wall. Nikolaev attempted to compensate for the shortage of space with elaborate ventilation system. This proposal seemed too radical even for the Soviet avant-garde, and the cabins were increased to 2,7×2,3 metres with proper windows.〔Khan-Magomedov, p.336〕
These windows ran the full length of a 200-metre building - narrow continuous bands of glass without apparent structural support; they were only 90 cmhigh (110 cmafter 1968 reconstruction). The residential block relied on a steel frame structure. Initially Nikolaev designed all load-bearing in steel, but due to metal rationing he eventually replaced internal floor supports with wooden girders. The building had elevators, but they were reserved for cargo deliveries only. Instead, the students had to use three spacious staircases - two in the living block and one in the public services building. The latter had an unusual triangular shape, with smooth ramps instead of stairs, as in contemporaneous work by Le Corbusier. These staircases are sometimes compared to the spiral ramp of the Guggenheim Museum in New York City.〔Machulina〕
According to Nikolaev, the lives of the students should have been regulated in a nearly military communal fashion. After a common wake-up call all the students proceeded to common physical exercise areas (either a gym in winter or an open area in summer); at this moment the residential block was to be locked until late evening. After exercise, the students took a shower and dressed up in the public service locker rooms; after a breakfast in the canteen they followed their college schedule - either in off-site auditoriums or in the study block facilities. Nikolaev suggested injecting ozone into ventilation ducts at night and even considered sedating students to ensure they all fall asleep in due time ((ロシア語:"не исключена возможность усыпляющих добавок"), ''"do not rule out the feasibility of sleepening additives"'').〔Khan-Magomedov, p.337, cites verbatim Nikolaev's article in Stroitelstvo Moskvy (''Строительство Москвы''), N. 12, 1929〕 Except for centralized sedation, this paramilitary order was actually maintained in the first years of operation, but later the regulations were eased up.〔Khan-Magomedov, p.337〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Communal House of the Textile Institute」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.